Memopezil ingredients: the full label, dose by dose
What are the ingredients in Memopezil?
The ingredients in Memopezil are bacopa monnieri extract 200 mg, rhodiola rosea extract 100 mg standardised to 3% salidroside, L-theanine 100 mg, panax ginseng extract 90 mg, and a 540 mg branched-chain amino acid blend of L-leucine, L-isoleucine and L-valine in a 2:1:1 ratio. Five entries, each with its own printed milligram figure, in a two-capsule daily serving. There is no proprietary blend, no caffeine and no stimulant of any kind.
- Best-evidenced entry: bacopa monnieri — but at 200 mg, below the 300 mg the trials used.
- Fastest-acting entry: L-theanine 100 mg, the only one with a same-day effect.
- Weakest entry: the 540 mg BCAA blend, which has no healthy-adult cognitive trial behind it.
Most ingredient pages for a supplement are a list of names with a compliment attached to each one. This is not that. Below is every entry on the Memopezil Supplement Facts panel, the amount declared for it, and the amount the published human trials actually used — because a milligram figure only means something next to the dose it is being compared with. Where the label amount falls short of the studied one, we say so. Where an ingredient has no relevant human evidence at all, we say that too.
The Memopezil Supplement Facts panel, in full
A two-capsule daily serving supplies the following. One 60-capsule bottle is therefore a 30-day supply.
| Ingredient | Amount per daily serving | Category | What it is included for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bacopa monnieri extract | 200 mg | Botanical | Memory acquisition and recall over weeks |
| Rhodiola rosea extract (3% salidroside) | 100 mg | Adaptogen | Mental fatigue under stress and workload |
| L-theanine | 100 mg | Amino acid | Calm, non-jittery attention, same day |
| Panax ginseng extract | 90 mg | Adaptogen | Short-term mental performance and fatigue |
| Branched-chain amino acid blend (2:1:1) | 540 mg | Amino acids | Nutrient base; not a cognitive active |
The single most useful thing about that panel is what is missing from it: a proprietary blend. Every amount is individually declared, which means every amount can be checked against the literature. That is the minimum condition for the rest of this page to be possible at all, and a surprising number of nootropic labels fail it — the mechanics of how are set out in proprietary blends versus named doses on a supplement label.
How each Memopezil dose compares with the dose used in trials
This is the comparison that decides whether an ingredient list means anything. Each row pairs the declared amount with a specific published human trial and its dose.
| Ingredient | Memopezil dose | Trial dose and duration | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bacopa monnieri | 200 mg/day | 300 mg/day for 12 weeks (Stough 2001) | About a third below the studied dose |
| Rhodiola rosea | 100 mg/day | 170 mg/day for 2 weeks and 576 mg/day for 28 days of SHR-5 (Darbinyan 2000, Olsson 2009) | Below both studied regimens; different extract |
| L-theanine | 100 mg/day | 100 mg with caffeine (Kelly 2008); 200 mg alone (Gerolymos 2026) | A real dose, at the lower end of the evidence |
| Panax ginseng | 90 mg/day | 200–400 mg/day of G115 (Reay 2005) | Well below the studied range |
| BCAA blend | 540 mg/day | No healthy-adult cognitive trial exists (Fernstrom 2005) | No comparison available |
Read the verdict column and the honest summary of this formula writes itself: the label is transparent, and the amounts are conservative. Three of the five entries sit below the doses that generated the research they borrow credibility from. That does not make them inert — dose-response for these botanicals is not a cliff edge — but it does mean nobody should expect a trial-sized effect from a below-trial dose.
Bacopa monnieri 200 mg: the strongest evidence, at a reduced dose
Bacopa monnieri is the reason this formula exists and the only entry with a repeatedly replicated memory finding behind it. In the trial by Stough and colleagues in Psychopharmacology, healthy adults took 300 mg a day of a standardised extract and were tested at baseline, 5 weeks and 12 weeks; the effect appeared at week 5 and was larger at week 12. Two further 12-week trials, Calabrese 2008 in adults aged 65 and over and Morgan and Stevens 2010 in older Australians, used the same 300 mg daily dose and reported improved delayed word recall.
The 2014 meta-analysis pooling those and other randomised trials is more restrained than the marketing built on it. Its most consistent pooled effects were on speed of attention — Trail Making Test B and choice reaction time — rather than on memory across the board. “Bacopa improves speed of attention over about twelve weeks” is a defensible sentence; “bacopa is a memory booster” is not.
Memopezil declares 200 mg. That is a genuine, checkable amount and it is a third less than the trial dose. The practical consequence is about patience rather than futility: if 300 mg needed 8 to 12 weeks to show up on a test battery, 200 mg is not going to do better on a shorter clock. The full timeline, week by week, is in how long bacopa monnieri takes to work.
What the label does not tell you about the bacopa
The panel prints a milligram amount but not a bacoside percentage. Bacosides are the compounds the trial extracts were standardised against, and without that figure two 200 mg entries from two different manufacturers are not directly comparable. This is not a Memopezil-specific failing — most labels in the category omit it — but it is a real limit on how precisely the dose above can be matched to the research.
Rhodiola rosea 100 mg: the right ingredient, a different extract
Rhodiola is included for the flat, foggy tiredness that arrives under pressure, and that is exactly what its trials measured. Darbinyan and colleagues dosed 170 mg a day of the SHR-5 extract for two weeks in physicians working night duty and recorded improvement on a composite of mental performance. Olsson, von Schéele and Panossian randomised 60 adults with stress-related fatigue to 576 mg a day of the same extract for 28 days and reported lower fatigue and better attention. Ishaque and colleagues reviewed the field in 2012 and found the trials too methodologically limited for a firm verdict, which is the honest ceiling.
Two things follow for the label. First, 100 mg is below both studied regimens. Second, and more importantly, those trials used SHR-5 — a specific characterised root extract — and matching a milligram figure with different material does not reproduce a trial. The Memopezil entry names a salidroside percentage but not a rosavin percentage, and rosavins are the marker that distinguishes genuine Rhodiola rosea from cheaper species in the same genus. Why that particular number carries so much weight is the subject of the rosavins versus salidroside label check.
L-theanine 100 mg: the only entry you may notice the same day
L-theanine is the fastest-acting ingredient on the panel and the one most likely to be responsible for any same-day sensation from the capsule. It is absorbed quickly, and Nobre and colleagues recorded increased alpha-band activity from 45 minutes after a dose. The best-replicated behavioural finding, though, is a combination result: Kelly and colleagues, in the Journal of Nutrition in 2008 tested 100 mg of L-theanine with and without 50 mg of caffeine and found that L-theanine alone produced no measurable change on the attention task, while the pair improved hit rate and target discriminability.
That matters here because Memopezil is caffeine-free by design. The counterweight is a 2026 meta-analysis in Molecular Psychiatry, which pooled 31 randomised trials and found that a single 200 mg dose taken 30 to 60 minutes before testing improved choice reaction time on its own — a solo finding, at twice the amount on this label. So 100 mg is a real, published dose with EEG data behind it, sitting at the lower and less replicated end of the behavioural evidence. We walk through the whole dose-response ladder in L-theanine without caffeine.
Panax ginseng 90 mg: the smallest dose on the panel
Panax ginseng is the entry with the widest gap between reputation and measured effect. The cognition literature runs almost entirely on G115, a standardised extract normalised to roughly 4% ginsenosides, at doses commonly between 200 and 400 mg a day. Reay, Kennedy and Scholey gave single 200 mg and 400 mg doses and reported reduced blood glucose and improved performance during sustained mental activity; a later trial in healthy young adults reported modest working-memory gains and higher subjective calmness. Against that, the Cochrane review of ginseng for cognition concluded there was no convincing evidence of benefit in healthy participants.
At 90 mg, Memopezil supplies well under half the low end of that studied range, and the label does not declare a ginsenoside percentage. The fair description is a supporting ingredient rather than an active one, and it carries a genuine caution that has nothing to do with dose: ginseng can affect blood glucose and has been reported to interact with anticoagulants such as warfarin. The wider evidence picture is in Panax ginseng for mental fatigue.
The 540 mg BCAA blend: honestly, a nutrient base
Branched-chain amino acids are the entry we would remove if the decision were ours, and we would rather say so than dress it up. The mechanism is genuinely real: leucine, isoleucine and valine cross into the brain on the LAT1 transporter, and Fernstrom’s 2005 review in the Journal of Nutrition showed that raising plasma BCAAs lowers brain uptake of tryptophan and tyrosine, because they compete for the same carrier. That is a documented, measurable effect.
It is also not obviously a good thing, and it has never been shown to improve cognition in a healthy adult. The human cognitive trials on BCAAs were run in patients recovering from severe traumatic brain injury, using intravenous infusion of about 19.6 grams a day — roughly thirty-six times the amount in this capsule, by a completely different route, in a completely different population. Add the arithmetic that an ordinary mixed diet already supplies something like 12 to 13 grams of BCAAs a day, and 540 mg becomes a rounding error against dietary background. Our full read is in why BCAAs are in a brain supplement.
What is not in Memopezil
Absences are as informative as inclusions, and three are worth naming because people search for them specifically.
- No caffeine or other stimulant. Nothing on the panel produces a coffee-style lift. If you want an acute jolt, this is the wrong category of product — the reasoning is in why coffee stopped working.
- No lion’s mane, ginkgo, citicoline or phosphatidylserine. These turn up in competing formulas and several of them have respectable evidence. They are simply not in this one, and any page implying otherwise is describing a different product.
- No gummy or liquid version. Memopezil is sold as a capsule. A gummy or drop marketed under the name is not the product this page describes.
What this ingredient list does not prove
Four limits, stated plainly, because a transparent label earns the right to be checked rather than a pass.
- No trial has tested this formula. Every study cited above tested a single ingredient at its own isolated dose. The five-ingredient capsule has never been through a trial of its own, and combining studied ingredients does not inherit their results.
- Three of five doses are below the studied amounts. Bacopa, rhodiola and ginseng all sit under the figures that generated their evidence. That is a reason for measured expectations, not a claim that they do nothing.
- Two standardisation figures are missing. No bacoside percentage for bacopa and no rosavin percentage for rhodiola means the match to trial material is partial.
- Nothing here treats a disease. These ingredients are studied for support in generally healthy adults. Genuine memory change is a medical matter, and it warrants a clinician rather than a capsule.
Medical note: this article is general information about a dietary supplement label, not medical advice, and Memopezil is not a treatment for any disease or condition. Speak to a healthcare professional before starting it, especially if you are pregnant, nursing, under 18, managing blood sugar, or taking anticoagulant, antidepressant or other prescription medication.
Related reading
- Bacopa and Rhodiola for Memory and Focus: What the Research Shows
- Nootropic Stack vs Single Ingredient: Which Wins?
- When to Take Bacopa, Rhodiola and L-Theanine
Frequently asked questions
What are the ingredients in Memopezil?
Memopezil lists five entries on its Supplement Facts panel: bacopa monnieri extract 200 mg, rhodiola rosea extract 100 mg standardised to 3 percent salidroside, L-theanine 100 mg, panax ginseng extract 90 mg, and a 540 mg branched-chain amino acid blend of L-leucine, L-isoleucine and L-valine in a 2:1:1 ratio. Each amount is printed individually rather than pooled into a proprietary blend, and the serving is two capsules a day.
How much bacopa monnieri is in Memopezil, and is it enough?
The label declares 200 mg of bacopa monnieri extract per daily serving. The randomised trials that found memory effects used 300 mg a day of a standardised extract for 8 to 12 weeks, so 200 mg sits about a third below the studied amount. That is a real gap and we are not going to smooth it over: the trial result belongs to 300 mg, and no trial has tested 200 mg of bacopa inside a five-ingredient capsule.
Does Memopezil contain caffeine or any stimulant?
No. None of the five label entries is a stimulant. L-theanine is the amino acid from tea that is usually paired with caffeine, but it is included here on its own, and rhodiola rosea and panax ginseng are adaptogens rather than stimulants. That means no same-morning jolt and no caffeine crash, but also no acute lift of the kind coffee gives you.
Why are branched-chain amino acids in a memory supplement?
The 540 mg BCAA blend is the weakest entry on the panel and we describe it as a nutrient base rather than a cognitive active. BCAAs do cross into the brain on the LAT1 transporter, but the human cognitive trials were run in patients recovering from severe traumatic brain injury using intravenous infusion, not in healthy adults taking capsules. A typical diet already supplies far more BCAAs than 540 mg.
What standardisation percentages does the Memopezil label not tell you?
The rhodiola entry names a salidroside percentage but not a rosavin percentage, and the bacopa entry gives a milligram amount without a bacoside percentage. Those two missing figures matter: rosavins are the marker that indicates genuine Rhodiola rosea rather than a cheaper species, and bacosides are the compounds the bacopa trials were standardised against. Read the current panel before buying.
Is the Memopezil formula itself backed by a clinical trial?
No, and no honest page should claim otherwise. Individual ingredients have been studied at their own isolated doses in their own trials. The finished five-ingredient combination has never been tested as a product, so every piece of evidence on this page is evidence about an ingredient, not about the capsule.
Scientific references
- Stough C. et al. — The chronic effects of an extract of Bacopa monniera (Brahmi) on cognitive function in healthy human subjects. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2001;156(4):481–484. PMID 11498727
- Calabrese C. et al. — Effects of a standardized Bacopa monnieri extract on cognitive performance, anxiety, and depression in the elderly. J Altern Complement Med 2008;14(6):707–713. PMID 18611150
- Morgan A., Stevens J. — Does Bacopa monnieri improve memory performance in older persons? J Altern Complement Med 2010;16(7):753–759. PMID 20590480
- Kongkeaw C. et al. — Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on cognitive effects of Bacopa monnieri extract. J Ethnopharmacol 2014;151(1):528–535. PMID 24252493
- Darbinyan V. et al. — Rhodiola rosea in stress-induced fatigue: a double-blind cross-over study of SHR-5 in physicians during night duty. Phytomedicine 2000;7(5):365–371. PMID 11081987
- Olsson E.M.G., von Schéele B., Panossian A.G. — Standardised extract SHR-5 of Rhodiola rosea in subjects with stress-related fatigue. Planta Med 2009;75(2):105–112. PMID 19016404
- Ishaque S. et al. — Rhodiola rosea for physical and mental fatigue: a systematic review. BMC Complement Altern Med 2012;12:70. PMID 22643043
- Kelly S.P. et al. — L-theanine and caffeine in combination affect human cognition as evidenced by oscillatory alpha-band activity and attention task performance. J Nutr 2008;138(8):1572S–1577S. PMID 18641209
- Nobre A.C., Rao A., Owen G.N. — L-theanine, a natural constituent in tea, and its effect on mental state. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2008;17(Suppl 1):167–168. PMID 18296328
- Gerolymos C. et al. — Cognitive and affective effects of L-theanine: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 31 randomized trials. Mol Psychiatry 2026. PMID 42410082
- Reay J.L., Kennedy D.O., Scholey A.B. — Single doses of Panax ginseng (G115) reduce blood glucose levels and improve cognitive performance during sustained mental activity. J Psychopharmacol 2005;19(4):357–365. PMID 15982990
- Reay J.L. et al. — Panax ginseng (G115) improves aspects of working memory performance and subjective ratings of calmness in healthy young adults. Hum Psychopharmacol 2010;25(6):462–471. PMID 20737519
- Geng J. et al. — Ginseng for cognition. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(12):CD007769. PMID 21154383
- Fernstrom J.D. — Branched-chain amino acids and brain function. J Nutr 2005;135(6 Suppl):1539S–1546S. PMID 15930466
See the full label and current pricing
Every amount above is printed on the panel rather than pooled into a blend. Check the current Supplement Facts and pricing for yourself before you decide.
Get Offer